I read a lot of conflicting advice first with a couple of accounts, so the comparison was at least fair. The variable that mattered was how granular the filters are — it is the difference between two opposite reviews.

I ran this for a couple of months in my own time, which is where the interesting part started. The thing nobody mentions is that how quickly fake profiles get removed is the part the marketing never mentions.

I started sceptical before deciding, so this is not a weekend opinion. The recurring theme was the honesty of the pricing page — it drives the outcome more than luck does. It came through clearly every time for both of the accounts I tested. It cost me nothing to verify ultimately, which would be genuinely useful to hear.

The things that actually moved the needle for me:

  • How obvious it is when someone has stopped using the app — surprisingly hard to find out in advance.
  • Worth confirming how reply rate compares with match rate — the marketing never covers this.
  • How the ranking treats a brand-new account — it matters more after the first month.
  • Look at whether you can filter out inactive accounts — most apps are quiet about this.

I tracked this rather than trusting impressions in my own time, which changed my answer completely. In practice whether photos are checked before publication drives the outcome more than luck does.