I kept notes the whole way through with a bit of patience, and the pattern turned out to be consistent. More than anything, the honesty of the pricing page moves the numbers more than anything else. It was true every time even accounting for luck.

I checked this against my own numbers with a couple of accounts, which is where the interesting part started. The variable that mattered was how much of your social graph it wants — it is where the real differences show up. The outcome barely moved fairly clearly regardless of how active I was. Treat it as a starting point in the end, and revise it freely.

I checked this against my own numbers across two cities, instead of going on impressions. The thing nobody mentions is that how the free tier is gated separates the usable options from the rest.

Concretely, the factors worth weighing:

  • Ask whether the bio field is long enough to be useful — it matters more after the first month.
  • Whether the free tier caps daily messages — it is easy to test and rarely advertised.
  • Worth confirming how the app orders your inbox — most apps are quiet about this.
  • How many profiles in your area have been active this week

I came at this after wasting time on the wrong options before deciding, and it was worth the effort. What I found is that how the free tier is gated changes noticeably month to month. It stood out consistently enough to trust across two completely different areas. I would not overthink it on balance, before changing anything else.